CAIRSS Blog

2009/05/28

Open Repositories Conference 09

Please note – The CAIRSS blog has relocated to http://cairss.caul.edu.au/blog

General Overview

This years Open Repositories Conference was held in Atlanta Georgia USA. This year marked the 4th year for this International Annual Conference. The Conference was held at the Georgia Institute of Technology Hotel and Conference Center.

Participants and Sponsors

The Conference had representatives from organizations including Dspace, Eprints, Fedora, VTLS, JISC, Microsoft Research, Sun Microsystems, @MIRE and NSF (National Science Foundation).

Microsoft Research

It was made quite clear to me throughout the conference that Microsoft Research were looking at carrying out research and development and not concerned with directly profiting from their involvement. There were several open discussions during workshops about how they would best create plug in functionality for their products that would enable their users to interact with Repositories. There was allot of constructive conversation hovering around how SWORD would be integrated with new Microsoft Research products/plug-ins. There were good discussions about whether the processing and converting of documents and meta data should be done on the Client, as a Web Service or handled directly by the Repository Software. The main challenges that I could see with doing this is deciding how much freedom to give to the user. Do they simply click a button upon completion of their work, or does the software allow them to interact at quite a low level with regards to meta data and file types, allowing them to review their work in the different formats before the final submission. I am assuming that if a researcher has spent several years writing and researching they would have a substantial amount of time to put the final touches on the master document to make sure that it rendered correctly in HTML and PDF. It would be amazing if we could write software that would handle everything behind the scenes, perhaps eventually we will arrive at this point.

DSpace

Where is Dspace heading? 2.0 can be expected early 2010

In the mean time 1.6 will be released as a stepping stone to 2.0 and will include bug fixes (due October 2009)

I ran into Kim Shepherd from the Library Consortium of New Zealand on my way out of Atlanta. Kim is a DSpace committer, we had a good conversation about DSpace 2.0 amongst other things. I will be sure to keep in touch and keep an eye on future development.

Dura Space Organization

Dura Space is an organization. The first technology to emerge from Dura Space will be a product called Dura Cloud. Dura Cloud consists of a complete hosting service using Dura Space partners (commercial cloud providers). While Dura Space is offering a cloud computing solution as a service, it is possible to download the code and create a cloud computing solution inside your own institution.

Components used by Dura Space are Akubra (A pluggable file storage interface), Mulgura (Semantic store), and Dura Cloud.

Dura Space expect more components will be considered for use as they are discovered.

@MIRE

I took a bit of time to talk to Bram Luyten from @MIRE. From what I understand @MIRE is a commercial company that works very closely with the developers of DSpace, as I understand it their staff include DSpace committers. @MIRE provide services including preparing and implementing repository solutions, technical assistance, bug fixes, customizations and a support service for the DSpace product.

As I understand it DSpace ships with a BSD license and is therefore very open to this sort of interaction and collaboration with a commercial company. To me this seems to be a fairly good approach to a Repository solution as it allows the flexibility of using an open source product with the option to request immediate assistance and support at a price should you need it.

Fedora

Fedora 3.2 wants to shift to using Akubra to replace the old Fedora storage interface. The Akubra API is not turned on by default in Fedora 3.2, it is hoped that developers will take interest in it over time. This will allow the new technology to be tested and implemented gradually.

An interesting feature of Fedora 3.2 that was mentioned is that you are now able to run multiple Fedoras instances with one Tomcat instance. This has been a topic that I have heard raised a few times over the last couple of years.

Poster Presentations

Squire

The poster sessions included Squire. Squire as you probably already know is the Java version ov the VTLS product VALET. It was developed with ARROW funding. It appears that VTLS has recently taken an interest in this product and it is possible that they will further develop it. Whether it remains open source or not remains to be seen.

graphics1

The Fascinator

This poster was presented by Peter Sefton. The Fascinator is an Apache Solr front end to the Fedora commons repository, I am again guessing that most of you probably already know that. You can find out more about The Fascinator here.

graphics2

You can find a full list of the Open Repositories Poster Sessions here

Photographs

The Open Repository organisers have provided a Flickr slide show of the entire conference. You will see Peter and Myself in the Minute Madness Poster Presentations as well as us discussing the finer points of our posters in the ball room.

Wrap up

I found that I got just as much information out of talking to people casually than I did during the formal presentations. I met so many people that I have a big job of going through my notes and contacting them all.

In my opinion there was a definite trend towards having distributed systems rather than a single repository. There were even discussions about Repository performance and how running only the database components on separate servers had marked increase in said Repositories performance. I was surprised at how many people are using open source products and building their own applications over the top. Very few used full proprietary solutions. One of the many examples of this would be Ruby on Rails application that incorporated Fedora using Jruby and of course one of the most impressive, our very own The Fascinator complete with multi-portal creation, harvesting framework, Solr indexing, security model as well as installers for Linux, MacOS and Windows. Oliver Lucido has also recently created a screen cast of the new desktop feature. Peters presentation went down really well he got quite a few laughs with some witty humor. Over all had a great time and cant wait until next time.

Advertisements

2009/05/25

Are you a tweeter? You can follow CAIRSS updates on Twitter if that is your style…

Filed under: Twitter — caulcairss @ 1:00 pm

Please note – The CAIRSS blog has relocated to http://cairss.caul.edu.au/blog

Want another way to stay updated on all CAIRSS and repository news? The ‘CAIRSS Central’ team are on Twitter – http://twitter.com/caulcairss  

The CAIRSS website News Stand has details on how to subscribe to CAIRSS twitter updates via your email, rss feeds, or via your own Twitter account. http://cairss.caul.edu.au/www/news_stand.htm

#caulcairss is Twitter Hash Tag you can use to tag when posting CAIRSS specific information in your own personal Twitter account. Tim has been tweeting some interesting ideas from the Atlanta Open Repositories Conference.

2009/05/13

What do you get when you combine DSpace and Fedora? … DuraSpace

Filed under: DSpace,Fedora — caulcairss @ 5:38 pm

Please note – The CAIRSS blog has relocated to http://cairss.caul.edu.au/blog

Fedora Commons and DSpace Foundation join together to create DuraSpace organization

Further details available at: http://www.duraspace.org/pressrelease.html

Research Repository Managers Symposium @ Educause

Filed under: Educause,ERA,SEER — caulcairss @ 5:37 pm

Please note – The CAIRSS blog has relocated to http://cairss.caul.edu.au/blog

Educause Australasia Conference (3-6 May Perth)

Some of the case studies from this repository event are now available online at: http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/3368
Please note they are still being added to.

Would be great to hear from any CAUL Repository Managers who attended.

I have picked up the following comments from participants:

  • ERA has taken over ‘traditional’ repository establishment activities in 2009 for many
  • Very honest discussions took place
  • Discussion on the need to ‘act together’ rather than go it alone (esp. for lobbying)
  • Concerns for sustainability of CAIRSS-like service (what happens when the funding runs out in 2 years)
  • Repository Managers feel isolated. Want more opportunities to discuss topics with their Repository Manager peers at other institutions
  • CAIRSS to organise a similar event at the 2011 Educause Conference

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.